3 calculators · 1 shared model

Run the numbers before the call.

Three calculators on one set of assumptions. Price a season, compare invitations with cold email and paid social, or work back from a quarterly pipeline target. Every default is tagged, and every formula is on its calculator page.

~/calculators $ ls -lModel assumptions

shared defaults:acv $40,000 · accept 34% · record 23% · opp 33% · win 25%

B2B lead generation calculators that use your numbers.

Three B2B lead generation calculators: guest-to-pipeline ROI, cost per meeting by channel, and a season planner that works back from your pipeline target. Every assumption is editable.

// 01 calculators

Three questions. Three calculators.

Each one answers a question buyers ask us on the first call. Pick the one closest to yours.

runs in your browser · nothing is sent
[01] guest-roiModel assumptions

Guest-to-pipeline ROI

What does a season return at our ACV, and how many deals cover it?

in: recorded guests / mo · guest → opp · opp → win · acv · tier
out: opps / mo · pipeline / mo · closed / yr · cost / yr · roi · break-even deals
at defaults
3.8×

$316,800 closed a year against $82,800 of Engine. Break-even at 2.1 deals.

[02] cost-per-meetingModel assumptions

Cost per meeting

Is an invitation cheaper than cold email or paid social?

in: volume · response rate · meeting and opp rates · monthly cost, per channel
out: cost per conversation · cost per opportunity · side by side
at defaults, per opportunity
≈$2,550

Against ≈$4,170 for cold email and ≈$3,330 for paid social. Cold email is cheaper per meeting: $625 against ≈$841.

[03] season-plannerModel assumptions

Season planner

How many invitations does a $400k pipeline quarter take?

in: quarterly target · acv · recorded → opp · accepted → recorded · acceptance
out: opps · recorded guests · acceptances · invitations · tier · ramp
at defaults, per quarter
≈388

Invitations for 10 opportunities: ≈30 recorded guests (≈10 a month) from ≈132 acceptances. Recommended tier: Engine.

// 02 shared_model

One model behind all three.

All three start from the same rates, so their defaults agree. Here they are, and what 1,000 invitations turn into at those rates.

Model assumptions
assumptiondefaultwhere it comes from
acv$40,000inside fit, which starts at $15k
invite acceptance34%program target, 30–40% range
accepted → recorded23%41% qualify × 56% record
recorded → opp33%about 1 in 3 (sample: 32 of 96)
opp → closed-won25%planning assumption; replace it first
program costtier price$3,900 · $6,900 · $11,500
per_1000_invites / default ratesModel assumptions
at $40,000 acv:≈$1.03M pipeline · ≈$258k closed

Estimates, not guarantees. Your numbers will differ. All three do steady-state math. None of them discounts for the ramp (the season planner shows it, but its counts assume a full quarter), the sales cycle or referrals from past guests. Put your CRM's last four quarters in before any of this goes in a board deck.

// 03 start_here

Start with the question your CFO will ask.

3 questions → 3 calculatorsModel assumptions

"What do we get back for $82,800 a year?"

Guest-to-pipeline ROI. At defaults, Engine closes $316,800 a year: 3.8× the program, with break-even at 2.1 deals.

Run the numbers →

"Why not hire another SDR?"

Cost per meeting. It puts a $7,500-a-month cold email motion (SDR plus tools) next to invitations, per meeting and per opportunity, and shows where cold email wins.

Run the numbers →

"What would $400k of pipeline next quarter take?"

Season planner. 10 opportunities, ≈30 recorded guests, ≈132 acceptances and ≈388 invitations, laid out on the day-18 to day-90 ramp.

Run the numbers →

Rather run it live? Bring your ICP to the monthly workshop, or send it with your application.

next: your ICP, real inputs

Your market beats our defaults.

Apply with your ICP and last year's win rate. We model guest volume, expected acceptances and pipeline on your numbers before you commit to a tier.